最小構成
特長
割り当てIPは、DIXのAS131921なのでGMOグループのクラウドでも上位のクラスになります。CentOS8にも対応。
実測値
東京
Hosted by OPEN Project (via 20G SINET) (Tokyo) [0.96 km]: 3.972 ms
Testing download speed
Download: 57.62 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed
Upload: 23.34 Mbit/s上海
Hosted by China Telecom (Shanghai) [1756.98 km]: 284.738 ms
Testing download speed
Download: 8.80 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed
Upload: 6.13 Mbit/sBench.sh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency : 2000.058 MHz
Total size of Disk : 50.0 GB (2.4 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 994 MB (845 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 14 days, 19 hour 40 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
OS : CentOS 6.10
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-754.10.1.el6.x86_64
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run) : 23.3 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 21.8 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 22.8 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 22.6 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 204.93.150.152 6.73MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 6.14MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 4.98MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 2.08MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 1.77MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 1.61MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 6.07MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 6.25MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 2.06MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 6.26MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 6.43MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------UnixBench
Benchmark Run: Mon Feb 18 2019 03:20:28 - 03:48:46
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21868606.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2386.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1670.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 199618.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 57624.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 467315.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 425877.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 120284.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4216.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3130.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 614.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 363748.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21868606.0 1873.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2386.0 433.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 1670.6 388.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 199618.7 504.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 57624.5 348.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 467315.9 805.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 425877.0 342.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 120284.2 300.7
Process Creation 126.0 4216.1 334.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3130.2 738.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 614.2 1023.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 363748.1 242.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 506.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Feb 18 2019 03:48:47 - 04:17:42
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 43141822.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4723.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3693.0 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 281943.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 72654.6 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 468585.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 843141.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 236494.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9758.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4948.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 687.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 659598.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43141822.8 3696.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4723.1 858.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 3693.0 858.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 281943.3 712.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 72654.6 439.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 468585.4 807.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 843141.5 677.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 236494.1 591.2
Process Creation 126.0 9758.1 774.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4948.6 1167.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 687.7 1146.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 659598.1 439.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 841.3経路
中国電信
traceroute to speed.189.cn (121.207.224.11), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 153.122.115.252 0.86 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo dix.jp
2 180.222.177.49 0.59 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo across.or.jp
3 180.222.188.246 0.81 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo across.or.jp
4 180.222.188.253 1.03 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo across.or.jp
5 210.138.78.93 0.91 ms AS2497 Japan iij.ad.jp
6 tky008bb00.IIJ.Net (58.138.104.185) 1.40 ms AS2497 Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
7 tky001bb10.IIJ.Net (58.138.88.1) 1.53 ms AS2497 Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
8 tky001ix11.IIJ.Net (58.138.102.202) 1.15 ms AS2497 Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
9 202.97.6.45 151.69 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
10 202.97.90.54 236.14 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
11 202.97.62.157 252.64 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
12 202.97.90.42 267.08 ms AS4134 China Fujian Fuzhou ChinaTelecom
13 *
14 *
15 121.207.224.11 255.78 ms AS133774 China Fujian Fuzhou ChinaTelecom中国聯通
traceroute to 220.196.42.133 (220.196.42.133), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 153.122.115.252 0.85 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo dix.jp
2 180.222.177.49 0.57 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo across.or.jp
3 180.222.188.246 0.92 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo across.or.jp
4 180.222.188.253 1.04 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo across.or.jp
5 210.138.78.93 0.88 ms AS2497 Japan iij.ad.jp
6 tky008bb00.IIJ.Net (58.138.104.185) 2.68 ms AS2497 Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
7 tky008ix11.IIJ.Net (58.138.104.10) 0.98 ms AS2497 Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
8 210.130.133.10 1.21 ms AS2497 Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
9 219.158.102.201 34.74 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
10 219.158.113.118 37.10 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
11 *
12 *
13 139.226.208.218 33.01 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
14 112.65.207.162 33.32 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
15 140.207.207.122 34.76 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
16 140.207.207.193 36.52 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
17 220.196.42.133 32.72 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom中国移動
traceroute to 211.139.129.222 (211.139.129.222), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 153.122.115.252 0.92 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo dix.jp
2 180.222.177.49 0.64 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo across.or.jp
3 180.222.188.246 0.96 ms AS131921 Japan Tokyo across.or.jp
4 210.138.78.89 0.84 ms AS2497 Japan iij.ad.jp
5 tky008bb01.IIJ.Net (58.138.104.233) 1.38 ms AS2497 Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
6 tky008ix11.IIJ.Net (58.138.104.38) 0.91 ms AS2497 Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
7 210.130.133.10 1.21 ms AS2497 Japan Tokyo iij.ad.jp
8 219.158.102.201 32.67 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
9 219.158.113.118 37.63 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
10 *
11 219.158.7.58 59.22 ms AS4837 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaUnicom
12 219.158.11.182 62.31 ms AS4837 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaUnicom
13 219.158.35.122 59.40 ms AS4837 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaUnicom
14 221.183.23.45 58.40 ms AS9808 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaMobile
15 221.183.26.166 61.48 ms AS9808 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaMobile
16 *
17 120.197.27.246 75.77 ms AS56040 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaMobile
コメント